From 9c4b8e24487843f0b52108ba99c8c01f03bfae81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erik Schilling <ablu.erikschilling@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:14:39 +0200
Subject: [Abilities] Renamed set to category

On the one hand setSetName and setName could sound misleading in the qt
client patch i plan. On the otherhand i never really liked the name
"set". I think category is more general and obvious.
---
 example/abilities.xml | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'example')

diff --git a/example/abilities.xml b/example/abilities.xml
index 317a4737..101c802e 100644
--- a/example/abilities.xml
+++ b/example/abilities.xml
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
 <abilities>
-    <ability-set name="Magic">
+    <ability-category name="Magic">
         <ability
             id="1"
             name="Test Spell 1"
@@ -24,5 +24,5 @@
             rechargespeed="10"
             target="point"
         />
-    </ability-set>
+    </ability-category>
 </abilities>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2