From 54df2e07fc4cc0bd8557e4152be15353ecf53d0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Longbons <b.r.longbons@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 03:12:32 -0700
Subject: Why must these things be so hard to test?

---
 src/sexpr/variant.tcc | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/sexpr')

diff --git a/src/sexpr/variant.tcc b/src/sexpr/variant.tcc
index 69bf191..a2ab7c0 100644
--- a/src/sexpr/variant.tcc
+++ b/src/sexpr/variant.tcc
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ namespace sexpr
     }
     template<>
     constexpr
-    size_t not_negative_one<-1>() = delete;
+    size_t not_negative_one<static_cast<size_t>(-1)>() = delete;
 
     class VariantFriend
     {
@@ -120,7 +120,10 @@ namespace sexpr
         }
         catch (...)
         {
-#if GCC_PATCH != 40702 // apparent compiler bug, not reduced
+#if GCC != 407 // apparent compiler bug, not reduced
+            // 4.7.2 from wheezy is bad
+            // 4.7.3 from jessie is good
+            // 4.7.3 from ubuntu-toolchain-test is bad
             static_assert(std::is_nothrow_constructible<D>::value, "first element is nothrow constructible");
 #endif
             data.template construct<D>();
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-60-g2f50